<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: one plus one equals ten?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://daryljwhite.us/2006/10/03/one-plus-one-equals-eleven/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://daryljwhite.us/2006/10/03/one-plus-one-equals-eleven/</link>
	<description>contemplating life and ministry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 23:59:24 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: kenbaptist</title>
		<link>http://daryljwhite.us/2006/10/03/one-plus-one-equals-eleven/comment-page-1/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>kenbaptist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Oct 2006 02:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://daryljwhite.us/2006/10/03/one-plus-one-equals-eleven/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>I revel in the idea of a generous orthodoxy.  To me, orthodoxy as it has so long been defined is like a blind man trying to map a continent - there&#039;s no way to even think about defining the boundaries.  Everyone&#039;s idea is different, so that everyone has their own definition that&#039;s not really the same as anyone else&#039;s orthodoxy.

Never mind that the One we&#039;re trying to map is bigger than the universe.

I&#039;m reminded of the joke - that all of us have laughed at, but only because we sadly know it&#039;s true - that if the perfect church existed, I&#039;d be the only member.  You can&#039;t walk side-by-side on a tightrope.

What if orthodoxy WERE generous?  What if the Truth was not this narrow, razor-thin tightrope we try to walk, but rather a much larger place than we had thought?  Suddenly, the air seems thinner and fresh, and we realize we&#039;re not as alone as we thought.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I revel in the idea of a generous orthodoxy.  To me, orthodoxy as it has so long been defined is like a blind man trying to map a continent &#8211; there&#8217;s no way to even think about defining the boundaries.  Everyone&#8217;s idea is different, so that everyone has their own definition that&#8217;s not really the same as anyone else&#8217;s orthodoxy.</p>
<p>Never mind that the One we&#8217;re trying to map is bigger than the universe.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m reminded of the joke &#8211; that all of us have laughed at, but only because we sadly know it&#8217;s true &#8211; that if the perfect church existed, I&#8217;d be the only member.  You can&#8217;t walk side-by-side on a tightrope.</p>
<p>What if orthodoxy WERE generous?  What if the Truth was not this narrow, razor-thin tightrope we try to walk, but rather a much larger place than we had thought?  Suddenly, the air seems thinner and fresh, and we realize we&#8217;re not as alone as we thought.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
